Why cardiovascular medicine should focus on patients, not environmental advocacy
kevinmd.com
April 9, 2026, 10:19 a.m.
Rather than looking ahead to the next generation of cardiovascular innovations and therapeutics, the European Society of Cardiology, American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association, and the World Heart Federation issued a “special communication” (“Environmental Stressors and Cardiovascular Health: Acting Locally for Global Impact in a Changing World”) redirecting their attention toward environmental risk factors (ERFs), such as noise pollution, artificial light at night, and urbanization. They offer that cardiovascular risk from ERFs surpasses traditional risk factors, like smoking, hypertension, and diabetes, yet none of the cited references substantiate this claim. More so, in these studies, causality with respect to cardiovascular risk is not established, confounders are not reliably controlled, and the relevance to clinical cardiology is effectively nonexistent.